Friday, April 11, 2025

A New Low

Yesterday I ended by saying the Trump regime is at a new level (in firing Erez Reuveni for admitting the deportation of Abrego Garcia was in error) and likely to go even lower. It just did.

In his April 10 substack post Thom Hartmann wrote:

The highest form of freedom in a democracy isn’t just the right to vote or protest — it’s the right to speak truth to power. To call out corruption. To challenge lies. To stand firm when the powerful demand silence. This is the freedom that sustains all others.

And it’s the one Donald Trump tried to crush yesterday…

After the November 2024 election there was speculation that Trump would exact vengeance on his political enemies with frivolous criminal charges. That is why President Biden made all those preemptive pardons. But he hadn’t done so – until Wednesday. Trump used other weapons at his disposal: revoking Secret Service protection and/or security clearance for his political rivals; cutting off lawyers and law firms from security clearance and access to federal buildings; withholding federal grants to universities; detaining and deporting student protestors.

On Wednesday April 9 President Trump signed an executive order directing the DOJ to investigate two civil servants from his first administration – Miles Taylor and Chris Krebs – whose only crime was telling the truth.

Miles Taylor served as Chief of Staff at the Department of Homeland Security. In 2028 while in office, Taylor wrote an anonymous op-ed for the NYT criticizing the Trump administration. In the October 2020 interview when Taylor revealed himself as the author, he said that “many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations. The country cannot rely on well-intentioned, unelected bureaucrats around the President to steer him towards what’s right. He has purged most of them anyway.” I would add that this time Trump has purged them all.

In 2029 Taylor published a book, anonymously, called “A Warning” with more details of the workings inside the first Trump administration.

On Wednesday Trump called Taylor a traitor who “wrote a book and said all sorts of terrible things that were all lies.”

In response to the executive order Taylor posted on X “I said this would happen. Dissent isn’t unlawful. It certainly isn’t treasonous.  America is headed down a dark path. Never has a man so inelegantly proved another man’s point.”

Chris Krebs was the top cybersecurity official responsible for elections security. After Joe Biden’s win in 2020 Krebs pushed back on the allegations of election fraud. He said “in every case of which we are aware, these claims [of fraud] either have been unsubstantiated or are technically incoherent.” For disagreeing with the MAGA position on election fraud, Krebs was fired by Trump. Later, as a witness for the January 6 Select Committee, he said “Republican officials, senior officials, including the former President, lied to the American people about the security of the 2020 election.”

As he was signing the executive order Trump repeated his lies about the “rigged” 2020 election and called Krebs “a significant bad-faith actor who weaponized and abused his Government authority.”

The authors of an article in Politico put the situation very mildly in writing:

A president ordering investigations of specific individuals whom he considers to be his political enemies is a remarkable breach of the traditional wall of separation between the White House and the Justice Department. Under that norm of separation, criminal investigations are supposed to be insulated from political pressure, but Trump has repeatedly scorned the notion of DOJ independence. Making Wednesday’s action even more remarkable, and perhaps unprecedented, is that Trump used the formal power of executive orders to effectively brand two individuals as subjects of criminal investigations.

There are two issues here. One is the frivolous charges against two men for doing their job and telling the truth. The more significant issue is the influence of the Executive Branch on the Department of Justice. During Trump 1.0 he communicated almost daily with his AG Bill Barr, pressuring him to go after certain people or to speed up the process. In contrast Biden to my knowledge had no influence on Merrick Garland after his appointment as AG. When Donald Trump announced his candidacy for President in the 2024 election Garland removed himself one step farther from Biden by appointing a special counsel, Jack Smith, to investigate Trump’s cases. Now Trump is not just pressuring the DOJ he is issuing an executive order demanding their investigation. Yet Trump and his followers still rave about Biden’s weaponization of the Justice Department against him and swears that he would never do such a thing.

At her Senate confirmation hearing for Attorney General, Pam Bondi said

Politics have got to be taken out of the system. This Department has been weaponized for years and years and years. And it has to stop… So will everyone be held to an equal, fair system of justice if I am the next Attorney General? Absolutely. And no one is above the law.”

[If you follow the link below to this story you will note that this page is from the Trump regime website and is titled “Following the Facts: Bondi Dispels Democrat Myths During Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing”. You would never find such blatant partisanship in the government website under Biden or any previous president.]

We will find out soon if Bondi is true to her words or if this is just another example of Republican hypocrisy.

Sources:

https://hartmannreport.com/p/is-this-the-moment-american-democracy-345

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/09/donald-trump-retribution-miles-taylor-00007512

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/opinion/trump-white-house-anonymous-resistance.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/28/us/politics/miles-taylor-anonymous-trump.html

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/following-the-facts-bondi-dispels-democrat-myths-at-senate-judiciary-committee-hearing

No comments:

Post a Comment

Two More Trump Supporters Discover Reality

My March 31 post featured Jennifer Piggott as an example of buyer’s remorse – people who voted for Trump that now regret it. Another Trump...